Decisional Regret Surrounding Dialysis Initiation: A Comparative Analysis.

Rationale & Objective: Dialysis comes with a substantial treatment burden, so patients must select care plans that align with their preferences. We aimed to deepen the understanding of decisional regret with dialysis choices. Study Design: This study had a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design. Setting & Participants: All patients from a single academic medical center prescribed maintenance in-center hemodialysis or presenting for home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis check-up during 3 weeks were approached for survey. A total of 78 patients agreed to participate. Patients with the highest (15 patients) and lowest decisional regret (20 patients) were invited to semistructured interviews. Predictors: Decisional regret scale and illness intrusiveness scale were used in this study. Analytical Approach: Quantitatively, we examined correlations between the decision regret scale and illness intrusiveness scale and sorted patients into the highest and lowest decision regret scale quartiles for further interviews; then, we compared patient characteristics between those that consented to interview in high and low decisional regret. Qualitatively, we used an adapted grounded theory approach to examine differences between interviewed patients with high and low decisional regret. Results: Of patients invited to participate in the interviews, 21 patients (8 high regret, 13 low regret) agreed. We observed that patients with high decisional regret displayed resignation toward dialysis, disruption of their sense of self and social roles, and self-blame, whereas patients with low decisional regret demonstrated positivity, integration of dialysis into their identity, and self-compassion. Limitations: Patients with the highest levels of decisional regret may have already withdrawn from dialysis. Patients could complete interviews in any location (eg, home, dialysis unit, and clinical office), which may have influenced patient disclosure. Conclusions: Although all patients experienced disruption after dialysis initiation, patients' approach to adversity differs between patients experiencing high versus low regret. This study identifies emotional responses to dialysis that may be modifiable through patient-support interventions.

As part of a quality improvement initiative in our dialysis practice, a patient stated, "I wish I never started dialysis." This quote served as the catalyst for embarking on a research project with the aim to understand why patients living with end-stage kidney disease have regret about starting and continuing dialysis, a lifesaving but time-intensive measure. We surveyed and interviewed patients on the topic and learned that patients experiencing regret had a disrupted sense of self and blamed themselves for their need of dialysis. Patients with little to no regret demonstrated positivity and self-compassion. These findings will help health care professionals as they work with patients considering dialysis or having newly started dialysis.

Congenital Syphilis in the Medicaid Program: Assessing Challenges and Opportunities Through the Experiences of Seven Southern States.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of congenital syphilis cases are increasing, particularly among lower socioeconomic populations within the southern United States. Medicaid covers a significant portion of these births, which provides an opportunity to improve birth outcomes. This project sought to collect information from key stakeholders to assess facilitators of and barriers to Medicaid funding of prenatal syphilis screening and to provide insight into improving screening and lowering incidence through the Medicaid program. METHODS: Seven southern states (Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) were identified for this assessment. Researchers conducted a legal and policy analysis for each state to gather information on factors affecting congenital syphilis prevention, identify knowledge gaps, and inform the development of interview guides. Seventeen structured interviews with 29 participants were conducted to gather information on facilitators and barriers to receiving timely prenatal syphilis screening through the Medicaid program. Interview transcripts were analyzed and compared to identify key themes. RESULTS: Barriers to timely prenatal syphilis screening include varied laws among the states on the timing of screening, Medicaid reimbursement policies that may not adequately incentivize testing, Medicaid enrollment issues that affect both enrollment and continuity of care, and lack of clear understanding among providers on recommended testing. CONCLUSION: This work provides insight into systemic issues that may be affecting rates of prenatal syphilis screening and incidence among Medicaid enrollees and others in the U.S. South. To address rising congenital syphilis cases, policymakers should consider requiring third trimester syphilis screening, adopting policies to enhance access to prenatal care, adapting Medicaid payment and incentive models, and promoting collaboration between Medicaid and public health agencies.

Navigating the Intersection of PrEP and Medicaid.

The proposed national PrEP program would serve people who are uninsured as well as those enrolled in Medicaid. In this article, the authors propose a set of recommendations for the proposed program's implementers as well as state Medicaid agencies and Medicaid managed care organizations to ensure PrEP access for people enrolled in Medicaid, addressing gaps without undermining the important role of the Medicaid program in covering and promoting PrEP.